Tonight, around 11 p.m., a group of at least 60-70 African American youth marched down one of the side streets (W. Thrush) to the 4 lane main drag (Sheridan). They were yelling threats to white residents. Things such as we need to kill alll the white people around here. They were physically intimidating anyone calling for help from the police. They were surrounding cars. Cars on the main drag had to slam on their brakes to either avoid the youth blocking not only all four lanes, but a large section of the side street as well. fights were breaking out among them. They were rushing residents who looked out their doors, going on to porches, yelling threats to people calling the police for help.And in an absolutely horrific story out of South Carolina (trigger warning justified), a pack of eight black teens robbed and then severely beat a white teen to the brink of death:
Police Chief Randy Scott said the 18-year-old victim, later identified as Carter Strange, was jogging through a parking lot near the intersection of Blossom Street and Saluda Avenue just after midnight on Monday when the assault happened. "This teenager was minding his own business, trying to make his curfew when he was brutally attacked and robbed," said Scott.And what does the mainstream media do - blame Matt Drudge for noting a pattern and cops for trying to maintain peace. They makes a conscious effort to hide details of racial patterns and hurl baseless invective at anyone willing to notice one. However, this insistence on colorblind delusion doesn't extend to the specious and often downright false claims about racial profiling. With that issue, we must hold the policemen (and society too!) responsible for exaggerating the transgressions of blacks. Due to their exculpating primarily black perpetrators and their efforts at hiding racial truth, I now view the MSM as complicit in a genocidal campaign against white America. They avoid blaming vile perpetrators of crime, instead, championing this amoral narrative of minority political, cultural, and social penury.
Police said Henrey and the seven juveniles he was with were roaming Five Points, targeting others until they came across Strange. In fact, investigators said the group tried unsuccessfully to rob or assault at least four other people.
Vicki said she rushed to the hospital and found a son she could barely recognize. "I literally bent over him; I recognized his hand and his hair, and I said 'that's my son,'" Vicki told WIS News 10. Carter's family told police the beating was so severe he required emergency surgery to remove a brain clot. He had his second surgery Friday afternoon, which was for facial reconstruction. It's Carter's latest step in a long road to recovery.
If you haven't noticed, I am about fed up. I propose that Carter Strange becomes a martyr for white America, an obviously good-hearted (one's face often reflects one's disposition) middle-class kid almost beaten to death by a pack of feral blacks, merely for the fun of it. Just how the Rev. Wright tapes and the "acting stupidly" case of "Dr." Henry Gates spurred a conservative renaissance of honest racial speech, these recent acts of violence need to wake up "honest, hard-working" Americans.
Now, I don't contend blacks are invading our towns like the War of the Worlds tripods; instead, we must look to the collusive effort of the MSM, the black-run Justice Department, anti-white popular culture, and anti-white academia that tacitly approves of anything that dispossesses whites of their national birthright. We have a wholly perverse value system that refuses to understand the phenomenon of black-on-white violence, a facet of the war against whites as a collective. We have a society that no longer respects whites as valuable human beings, manifested in the tripe about "privilege" that denigrates their achievements, popular media that mocks white men as doofuses, "two minutes of hate" campaigns against anyone straying outside the PC, direct disenfranchisement via immigration from Latin America, and the increasing number of racist attacks across the country.
Regarding the Carter Strange attack, Lawrence Auster describes the perpetrators as "savages". I've seen other descriptions of these attacks as committed by "feral blacks." But such terms do not adequately describe the nature of these attacks. These black youths did not merely rob Mr. Strange, an act at least logical in its motivation. No, these blacks robbed Mr. Strange then gang-beat him until he needed facial reconstructive surgery and suffered a blood clot that almost killed him. The terms "savage" and "feral" presuppose a basic humanity to the individuals, not domesticated by civilization but still possessing the empathy and compassion of man. The actions committed by this pack of blacks reflects a wholly evil disposition, something that we should not even consider worthy of society's nurturing.
I propose we begin calling these vile creatures subhuman. This degrading term reflects the sickness of their hearts, the rampant evil present that could cause them to act in such a carnal, animalistic manner. They are not human, they are animals deserving of life in a cage, a sentence unlikely given their ages and the soft justice system. Hell, we can't even know their names because they're too young.
Clearly I believe that words carry a deep meaning. It's important that we use language that adequately reflects our emotions and illustrates whatever phenomenon we wish to describe. I read the article on Carter Strange. Then I looked at the picture of the one 19 year-old gang member, as I'm sure most of you have done. In thinking about the nauseating act of violence and seeing the man's face, I'm sure I'm not the only person who thought to himself, "fucking nigger." Now, I never use that word here and I discourage others from using too. It's not a word that I think should be thrown around because we no longer live in that society. And we should at least give blacks the opportunity to adopt white, middle-class mores, an presumably unattractive task if we degrade them in such a manner.
But those black teens are niggers. When I use the term here, I apply it to these specific individuals who committed an act of violence, a type of violence, that now seems unique to blacks. Of course, evil exists in people of all races, but this type of unprovoked violence without any reasonable motivation is only done by blacks. We shouldn't use the term nigger in a general sense, thereby denigrating upstanding blacks like Walter Williams. We should use it to categorize this particular type of animalistic, subhuman evil that manifests almost exclusively in blacks - the kind of evil that propels a man to beat another man to death for absolutely no reason whatsoever.
Note 1: I know whites used to lynch blacks, but more whites than blacks were actually killed during the height of lynching. Plus, the black lynchings reflected a state-sanctioned racial hierarchy that all but encouraged the violence. The murders were just as evil and sickening, but a different, more "civilized" type of evil that doesn't suggest a pack of animals attacking a helpless prey.
Note 2: I do not condone use of the term "nigger" in a general context.
Note 3: I described the Carter Strange attack to a close, race-realist family member, using no details whatsoever. As a thought experiment, I merely asked him, "tell me something, anything about the story" and he immediately said the respective races.
74 comments:
Agree 100 percent: they are indeed niggers.
Cataloguing the misdeeds of blacks becomes boring after a while, since it's the same old crap over & over again. It's not like some genius black scientist is going to invent a death ray that only works against white people. That would at least be interesting.
What IS interesting and worth analyzing is the reaction and evolution of white people, because they are the ones who can stop the rot - just as many white people facilitated the rot, or made excuses for it, organized white people can stop it.
History shows that change can happen overnight. Who would have predicted the collapse of communism in 1985? Who in 1950 could have predicted that America's whole race relations paradigm was about to get turned upside down?
If the backlash is really coming, I want to see some focus on the how, the when and the where. By all means make the unfortunate Carter Strange a martyr. What happens then? How to make sure he doesn't become just another victim like 1000s of others?
Peoria was Kristallnacht. The question is, was this a spontaneous occurrence that is inevitable wherever there are blacks and lax justice, with ones like it soon to be effectively put down by authorities... or was this indirectly but purposefully encouraged by elements within our political class?
-PA
As to lynching a century ago, keep in mind that many if not most were retaliatory in nature. In other words, rough justice meted out for REAL offenses. In contrast, the young man who was lynched in SC was innocent if any offense.
In the years 1882 to 1968, the official statistics are that 3,446 blacks were lynched by whites in the U.S. So about 40 lynchings per year. Each year on average, there are 770,000 violent incidents of rape, murder, assualt, robbery perpetrated by blacks against whites or whites against blacks. In 85% of these cases, blacks are the perpetrators and whites the victims. So there are about 540,000MORE acts of violence PER YEAR perpetrated by blacks against whites than vice-versa.
I apologize for my last post. The Patriarchy made me do it.
Link - http://www.suntimes.com/news/cityhall/6145603-418/top-cop-garry-mccarthy-likens-federal-gun-laws-to-racism.html - Connection?
Headline in Peoria paper..."Some claim reports of racist Peoria mob are exaggerated: Account of group walking through West Bluff captures national attention."
This is what unfettered alpha male procreation begets. Aristotle reserved the word magnificent for the wealthy, so I'll also reserve alpha male for the civilized.
Instead, unfettered Dark Triad sexual selection results in a generation of miscreants.
Or, the kids always behaved this way, but modern communication technology and cheap mass transit caused the problem to "tip".
http://www.pjstar.com/news/x2069925100/Account-of-racist-Peoria-mob-spurs-national-attention
Just like in the Chicago Tribune, the local paper is trying to downplay these incidents.
Interesting, Cleveland now is a city on edge:
http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2011/06/hordes_of_unruly_teens_shut_do.html
Remember that Milwaukee has had Mahogany Mob attacks as well. That means Philadelphia, Cleveland, Chicago, Long Island, St. Louis, and and a few other northern cities have had these type of incidences transpiring.
The south has yet to have anything like this, save 'snatch and grab' in Atlanta.
Very interesting.
They are not feral, or savages, or subhuman; they are citizens of an advanced civilization which specifically authorizes this behavior, as part of it's greater overall scheme of social control and organization. We must demand the masters of this civilization to put an end to it, or replace them, one way or another.
(Posting as anon because Google comments doesn't work for me.)
The article says the Peoria police are advising residents to go inside and lock their doors. WTF? Bullies need someone to stand up to them. These people in Peoria need to do the opposite of what the police say. They ought to all sit on their front porches with guns. Once these "youth" see one or two of their comrades get acute lead poisoning, maybe they'll back off. At the very least it will thin the herd a bit.
The majority of blacks hate whites. The "youths" engaging in this urban terrorism are simply the bolder, more reckless ones willing to take chances. There's lots of blacks with them in spirit if not in person.
Look at how this sort of thing, combined with other things like their traditional race riots, has served to benefit blacks in general. White flight due to terrorism has made a lot of neighborhoods and great homes available to blacks moving in at cut-rate prices. Black neighborhoods in this city contain a huge amount of well built homes, built when the area was white. They may be running them down now, but it's not all just slums as one might think from watching television.
Another benefit for them is that white society keeps throwing money their way in the form of one program after another, hoping to buy peace. This way the threat of violence, accompanied by actual outbursts, actually pays off financially.
The expanded welfare programs from the 60's on were intended as a form of fire insurance.
When you see how as a group they gain by the actions of a percentage of that group then the interrelatedness between the active actors and the seeming nonparticipants is actually closer than it seems on the surface.
These attacks will not stop until whites fight back. The strong do what they can, the weak suffer what they must.
The south has yet to have anything like this, save 'snatch and grab' in Atlanta.
SBDPL the South-West is being dispossesed by Latinos so it's more Protestant White vs Catholic Hispanic. We have to also account the fact that racial mixing is mostly starting to be White/Latino here accompained by small mixing of White/Asian or White/Black. Sure we see many Blacks but most of these creatures stay in the city whereas Latinos and Whites are waging war in the Suburbs and the rural areas.
I see a lot of anger at White males but please think of two things.
Number one MSM kills these stories not only to protect the offenders but to destroy any type of mobilization of Whites. Most people still use traditional sources of media for news even if that is changing. If you only hear of one story and that story is vague it is easily seen as a one time incident.
Two: there is a cost benefit analysis to actions people who have standard intelligence weigh their actions. Whites not only realize that if the defend their selves physically they will be incarcerated. They also realize they will be sued and lose home, car, savings, and any wealth accumulated.
This is a very unfair situation blacks have no fear of jail many see it as a positive street cred thing. They also have no fear of losing a job or accumulated wealth as they are subsidized by the government.
MuayTyson
@Raul DeMarco:
If we were to compare total murder rates, including lynching, during the KKK years with current rates, might one not conclude that lynching was actually good for everyone?
OneSTDV:
I discovered your blog a few weeks ago. Your insights are interesting and this site is now one of my daily reads.
You wrote:
"[[Of course, evil exists in people of all races]], but this type of unprovoked violence without any reasonable motivation is only done by blacks"
Why do you feel the need to apologize for the un-bracketed portion of the above statement?
You're qualifying behavior that requires no permission-slip to recognize it for what it is: nigger behavior.
Why does it matter that evil exists in people of all races? We're dealing with niggers here, plain and simple - no apologies or qualifiers needed.
I think this subconscious need to grovel and explain we're not racists, however subtly, is acutely White.
Due to their exculpating primarily black perpetrators and their efforts at hiding racial truth, I now view the MSM as complicit in a genocidal campaign against white America.
White America is not being genocided, black crime is at a historic low.
And black misbehavior seems to be this bad everywhere they go and throughout time. The black favellas of Brazil are guarded with paramilitary forces, blacks commit just as much crime in Europe, etc.
One of the reasons blacks were lynched in the South was probably simply due to the fact that Southern whites had more physical contact with blacks back then and were thus exposed to more atrocious black behavior than they are today because transportation has made it easier to navigate around black neighborhoods.
If you haven't noticed, I am about fed up. I propose that Carter Strange becomes a martyr for white America,
White Americans (including middle class whites) won't become more attracted to sociobiology because of this one black on white attack because they don't view themselves as victims because they run everything.
Ethnic martyrs are for minorities, not white people, because white people don't feel like victims, they feel like winners.
Advertising/Marketing race realism to whites by portraying them as victims won't work to win them over anymore than hurrican Katrina did because whites run everything and, these current swarm attack notwithstanding, black crime is lower than ever because of increased incarceration of blacks and tougher law enforcement since the 1990s and because 15 million young blacks were aborted since Roe v Wade.
You need to find a way to market HBD without portraying whites as victims because it has limited staying power. NAM dysfunction can get whites to prod their politicians for more stringent law enforcement but its not bad enough that it will cause whites to embrace race realism. If NAM dysfunction were so bad then we wouldn't have seen the whiter Northern states have so many middle class white residents move to Southwestern states where the illegal alien invasion is strongest.
Btw, I'm only criticizing using this incident to MARKET race realism to middle class whites, I support HBD measures to further reduce black mayhem like cutting off all welfare benefits that help blacks pay for raising children in order to lower their birthrate, eliminating prison gyms and replacing them with candy machines (because weight training increases dopamine and thus aggression and high carb diets reduces dopamine) and sterilizing black criminals.
I'm just telling you that these incidents won't help MARKET HBD to a broader white audience because they don't view themselves as victims. There will be outrage and middle class whites will discuss these crimes, but it won't convert them to race realism anymore hurrican Katrina did.
@ TUJ:
The notion that "whites run everything" is a leftist lie:
http://onestdv.blogspot.com/2011/06/misleading-racial-hierarchy.html
Plus, you really think whites run everything when they're now a minority of children under two and are being displaced in the general population via Hispanic fecundity (though Hispanic births decreased last year). For more see the paragraph and links that starts with, "Now, I don't contend blacks..."
Seriously, some of your last comment makes you sound like an anti-racist liberal.
I agree that black violence is somewhat exaggerated, but it's also the most palatable to a wider audience. Political initiatives don't always have to reflect exact truth.
White America is not being genocided, black crime is at a historic low.
Well, it's at a historic low since the 1960's. But, if the Carter Strange incident had happened in Columbia, SC of the 1950's and earlier you would have seen the perps dead by sunrise the next day.
I'm wondering whether these black flash mobs aren't sort of like the black version of Anonymous. Both are made possible due to modern communications technology.
The difference is that the blacks "DDOS" RL places, not websites.
Plus, you really think whites run everything when they're now a minority of children
Of course they run everything. White children are a minority in Latin America but are you going to deny whites run everything important in Latin America?
Collectively, the world's European people do everything important despite the PC regime, from Nobel prizes, to culture, to foreign policy, to military technology.
Everything really important is done by Europeans, even East Asians can advance to the extent they copy the European peoples.
Seriously, some of your last comment makes you sound like an anti-racist liberal.
I'm not a liberal. Liberals don't support sterilizing black criminals, reducing the black birthrate and whites only immigration like I do.
I'm only criticizing you from the perspective of MARKETING: White people won't respond to an HBD appeal that portrays them as victims because they (largely correctly IMO) believe that they are winners. In marketing, a target audience's response to an ad correlates to how that ad relates to their own self image. If whites don't have a self image as losers and victims of genocide (even if you think they should) then your appeals won't go far.
Even if they are not winners, white people still don't view themselves as victims and trying to market HBD to whites as victims will go nowhere just like every other black atrocity.
@TUJ- White people run things? Which white people? There are many different groups of white people, some of whom are the powerful leaders of the leftist coalition, and many who are not.
Crime is down, but the recent mob attacks are something new and disturbing. And regular black crime, as sadistic as it is, is still a big problem.
@Chicago has it right- black crime has led to a lot of benefis for blacks as a group, and black riots have always resulted in political concessions for blacks. Individual blacks get punished, but they are honored and respected by other blacks for their attacks on whites.
So in the animal world, hybrids often don’t reproduce not just because of genetic sterility, but because of sexual selection. There are unique factors of attraction that each species is looking for, and so the mutant hybrid in the middle is a freakish abomination to both sides of the family. Thus even though the hybrid might be genetically compatible with both species, he will never have a chance to reproduce, and is thus functionally sterile. As far as sexual selection goes for WM/AF mutants, Asian & white females who are total bitches and enjoy emasculating Asian men, would just write Eurasian men off as another gook, and non-brainwashed fighting white and Asian females would recognize what a monstrosity WM/AF is, see it as the violent attack on both Asianness and Womanhood that it is, and would never date the offspring of such an abomination over a pureblooded Asian man. An asian woman with pride, and a progressive white woman would never choose a Hapa over an Asian male. So evil women wouldn’t want hapa males for evil reasons, and good women wouldn’t want hapa males for good reasons.
So what else can we expect from the monstrosity of white male asian female couplings than a freakish monster? And thats what I am. An elephant man. A retard. All my life my parents have been telling me what a freak I am. And I was so deluded into thinking I wasn’t a freak, that it really pissed me off to be called a freak. And you know what, even now that I’ve been enlightened into accepting my freakishness, it still pissess me off! But now I accept I’m a freak, I embraced my retardedness. Then my mom bitches, I have low self-esteem. After decades of you telling me I’m a freak, I’ve thrown my hands up. And you wonder why I have low self-esteem? Its a miracle that I blinded myself for so long to have delusions of grandeur, when I was such a freak. But I’m not a total retard. I’m supposed to be “smart” in the mechanical way Asian people are. Rote-learning without any real creativity or understanding. Take all the Asian stereotypes and put them on me personally, and Model Minority becomes my personal psychological issues, since your oh so color blind. Take every single insult you can throw at a man (yes even intelligence is an insult in a geeky nerdy way), and you have the stereotype of the Asian man. Now stereotypes are often by definition offensive, but I think the Asian male stereotype is unique in perfectly encapsulating everything you don’t want in a man. So my parents just take that, throw it on me as an individual. So its not Asian males who suck, its me I, who suck personally.
Two: there is a cost benefit analysis to actions people who have standard intelligence weigh their actions. Whites not only realize that if the defend their selves physically they will be incarcerated. They also realize they will be sued and lose home, car, savings, and any wealth accumulated.
This is all true, but what other measures can be taken? If whites value their short term well being more than the long term well being of the race, then there is no hope for whites. Nelson Mandela, whom I consider a vile character, endured twenty-seven years of prison for his cause. Vilfredo Pareto relates a story (in, I think, The Transformation of Democracy) about a French noble during the Revolution who had a warrant out for his arrest. He said he would shoot anyone who carried it out, and because he went about armed, he was never arrested. American whites are too afraid of being called racist, so they are joining the Jews and Russian dissidents in the camps, so to speak.
TUJ is right. Whites still run everything in the US that runs properly.
And when TUJ refers to "self-image" on the part of rights, he's even doubly correct. Most whites still don't see themselves as "under siege" and they don't understand the full ramifications of demographic trends.
Obama himself is little more than a mouthpiece for the (mainly Jewish) liberals that surround him and give him his ideas. Basically, he's John Kerry in blackface.
And yes, the federal government subsidizes blacks and gives them jobs at a disproportionate rate, but this is hardly making blacks economically advanced. (although certainly a lot better off than in their native land in Africa)
"I now view the MSM as complicit in a genocidal campaign against white America."
You're coming closer to my way of thinking every day. I don't know how you feel about that (probably horrified) but I find it gratifying.
"Subhuman" is a good word to describe Strange's attackers; "animals" is not. I don't know of any animals that go about in packs to attack other members of their species for sport.
Frankly, I didn't even think about the depth of depravity of these attackers when I first read the story. All I could think was "They have got to go." As I see it (and you'll probably come to this POV sooner or later), any discussion of the [lack of] morality of the attackers is merely a distracting side issue.
This is the sort of thing that evidently happens routinely in South Africa or Zimbabwe. Here, it is abnormal and abberant. Draw your own conclusions.
"Peoria was Kristallnacht."
Not even close. For one thing, there isn't any video widely available. In this day and age, a mere newspaper account (and one that's contradictory and contradicted by other accounts) doesn't even satisfy someone like me, who's inclined to believe the worst. You really need a graphic video that goes viral. It will take much more than Peoria for the situation to reach flash point.
Though when that happens, things may well happen very rapidly on a variety of fronts (fire point).
I checked out Carter's facebook page; from what I can tell he's an ordinary kid. Five hundred-something friends, which is pretty typical for male FB'ers. Including Blacks and Hispanics.
I can't help but wonder what his minority friends' reaction will be. Will they feel ashamed of what has happened? And how their races are overrepresented in these stats? Will they be indifferent? Or will they somehow feel that the whole thing is Carter's fault, for making them look bad yet again?
I believe the way to market race realism is to market Europeanism and Americanism. It was the relatively small percentage of White Europeans/Americans who have colonized and conquered the World for the last 700 years.
The Left loves to control the debate by controlling language but we have experience and proof on our side. The Left made colonize and conquer dirty words and bad things. Do you think Mongolians feel shame that Genghis Khan was successful in his campaigns?
There is now undeniable proof that European colonization was good for Africans. One only needs to look at South Africa and Zimbabwe and ask are they better off now or when Whites were in control?
We need to bring back the noble knight, rugged frontiers man, the cowboy, and all the heros who made Western culture great before the Left twisted them into some sort of evil caricatures they are today.
Make it cool to be White again.
MuayTyson
@TUJ
Who are these whites who believe that they run things?
That may be true for the baby-boomers, but amongst the younger generation, whites are under the impression that they are increasingly excluded from positions of power or prominence.
It's the younger generation that's going to drive any significant change. The baby boomers are all paid off, and the generation following them still has impressive demographic weight. Once you get to the generations that are actually threatened by these societal changes, though, you start seeing an incentive to push back.
"Make it cool to be White again."
No. Make it admirable to be a conservative White again.
Much harder but potentially much more rewarding.
@Kylie
"Subhuman" is a good word to describe Strange's attackers; "animals" is not. I don't know of any animals that go about in packs to attack other members of their species for sport."
I would suggest 'beasts'.
Some of you people are forgetting whom elslaved who.
Blacks SHOULD be angry. We have an inequitable system that priveleges white males.
We have an inequitable system that priveleges white males.
Yes, we have a system that rewards intelligence.
This puts black males at a huge disadvantage.
"I would suggest 'beasts'."
Great suggestion. I wish I'd thought of it.
"Some of you people are forgetting whom elslaved who."
What does "elslaved' mean? Also, "who" and "whom" respectively are in the wrong places. Him did indeed "elslaved" he. You probably mean, "Who enslaved whom?" and blacks and Middle Easterners have enslaved blacks long before whites have, and they abolished slavery much later than western nations. Bin Laden even had Somalian slaves.
The fact that other peoples had slaves doesn't make it right, but the whites whom you despise have enacted the laws against slavery, signed affirmative action into law, etc. Blacks also benefit from western medicine, infrastructure, innovation, and people come from all over the world to take part in (and eventually take over and destroy) what we created. White innovations such as disease resistant crops and vaccines have saved millions of lives around the world.
I also noticed that you interjected "males", do you find white women too beautiful to exclude from your "privilege" peddling? Mentioning males specifically is a failed attempt to divide men and women, white women and white men are a package deal.
"Some of you people are forgetting whom elslaved[sic] who."
No, we're not. We're also not forgetting that it was blacks who sold their own brethren into slavery to whites and other blacks.
"Blacks SHOULD be angry. We have an inequitable system that priveleges[sic] white males."
Well, then, they'd best get themselves to Rhodesia or South Africa ASAP.
In any case, I don't think much of a privilege that allows others to rampage at will and constrains the so-called privileged from responding in kind or even defending themselves.
"We have an inequitable system that priveleges white males"
Affirmative action privileges White males?
Every institution in this country is geared toward lifting the lowly black population above so-called 'White privilege'.
This anti-nature dogma is bringing this country to its knees.
"Make it cool to be White again."
This is very possible for the corporations to do, since they can essentially manufacture cultures and market them. Instead of marketing a manufactured culture created in a boardroom, they could market the organic white culture.
There was a movie made about Thor, and I think it is wonderful that they make movies about western mythological narratives. They could also make movies on actual historical figures such as Aristotle, Eratosthenes, Hypatia (without the actual martyrdom of course), Alexander the Great, Baron d'Holbach, Giordano Bruno, various captains of industry, how after the slaves were freed after the civil war they traveled in mobs and raped and murdered random people and its negative effects on society, etc.
"Well, then, they'd best get themselves to Rhodesia or South Africa ASAP."
Some American blacks are moving to Kenya to join its emerging middle class.
How whiny we white people are.
NO Wonder black men are so damn atttractive to white women!
As for whites collectively owning slaves... I'm sure the factory owners and serfs loved ordering their slaves around! In all seriousness most whites are descended from victims and didn't have preferential treatment by the (white) elites just for being white. There were even Muslims who captured white slaves off the European coast, and Voltaire's "Candide" satire has what is probably an accurate description of the Islamic slavers' savagery (gang raping, dismemberment, even cannibalism).
"How whiny we white people are. NO Wonder black men are so damn atttractive to white women!"
LOL
http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2011/03/online_dating_t.php
One, I felt the same way when I saw that thug's face. You can tell alot by a face, and his said stupid, unremorseful, unproductive, violent, ignorant.However, it's important that all HBDers remember that anger is an emotion that must be controlled. One of the reasons Steve Sailer is so effective is because he doesn't get angry. He doesn't let venom drip from his pen, even when that would be the emotionally accurate thing to do.
My perspective is different. I would not use the N word ever. I think it wisest to never use it.
However, ... a wise man knows that nearly all non-Whites are filled with racial hatred to the degree that if they think they can get away with it they will beat to death any soft-target White person. I.E. a single White person alone.
Black people are neither savages nor angels. They are people filled with racial hatred against Whites. Who have no check on their racial hatred. And act it out on every turn. No race has a monopoly on racial hatred, violence, and acting out of same. Right now Black people have no check on their hatred and will continue to do such things until they are checked.
I do not care if Black people hate or love me, I merely wish any violence against me to be checked.
I do see a difference vs. TUJ. Most Whites are terribly vulnerable to Section 8 (destroying their lives/property value -- for most people even now all they have money wise). AA and the student loan crunch means White kids can look forward to serfdom/peonage while non-Whites have much higher net income (no student loan payments). Non-Whites crowd out Whites in schooling, mate markets, government subsidies, and the like.
We are seeing a bubble burst. A bubble predicated on 40 plus years of uninterrupted GDP growth now come a cropper. Chinese goods are more expensive (cheap labor is running out there), higher commodity prices, etc. means a lower standard of living, crowding out of Whites, and terrible resentment.
This will not end well.
Today's young blacks are so amazingly steeped in phony victimhood that if you bring up an incident like this to them, many will insist that the white kid did something to deserve his beating. They'll say something like, "he thought he was better than them." Writer John McWhorter dubbed this "therapeutic alienation."
Today's young blacks are so amazingly steeped in phony victimhood that if you bring up an incident like this to them, many will insist that the white kid did something to deserve his beating. They'll say something like, "he thought he was better than them."
Or they will just lie and claim that the lone white person made a "racial comment" to 15 young blacks.
This is what happened after the Sarah Kreager incident on the Baltimore City bus:
http://washingtonexaminer.com/local/sarah-kreager039s-attackers-convicted-bus-beating
Auster's headline today: "THE MEDIA'S BERLIN WALL IS STARTING TO CRUMBLE"
What an excellent analogy to media's blackout of black lynchings of whites. An entire generation of journalists will be studied one day as profiles in infamy.
The whole damn thing got out of hand when the truck driver, Reginald Denny, was pulled from his vehicle and had his head stomped on repeatedly by black youths during the Rodney King riots.
Denny was stupid enough in his testimony in court to issue some kind of an apology on behalf of whites for black oppression and to state publicly that he forgave the guys that stomped on his brain and to state he understood why they did it. The LA media and the country's MSM delighted in that.
Denny's act was the act of someone not evolutionarily fit. By damn, I resent that he offered an apology for me, a white woman, since I did nothing wrong.
That idiotic act of his opened the floodgates to this kind of thing. People like Dan Rather and Peter Jennings and Ted Turner just ate that crap up and their progeny are even more the butt-lickers than they were.
this type of unprovoked violence without any reasonable motivation is only done by blacks
There is one other group that does that: Muslims. In countries they rule (including allegedly moderate and modern Malaysia and Indonesia), they torch entire neighborhoods on unsubstantiated rumors of one offense or another. Friday afternoon post-mosque riots are routine. In Europe, they take over huge swaths of public space every Friday as a show of power. Also, google "france carbecue". Every forcible rape in the last 5 years in Sweden was committed by a Muslim. It's so bad Swedish girls are dying their blond hair so they don't stand out. Imagine what they'd be doing in the US if they had the numbers they have in Europe.
"NO Wonder black men are so damn atttractive to white women!"
Don't listen to Whiskey. Only the rare black man is attractive to a white woman, at least to a white woman with a decent IQ.
Don't be so hard on Reginald Denny. Even sophisticated individuals can be outgamed by a battalion of media operatives, and sing what they tell him to sing.
And this was 1992, there was no internet media, and any un-PC thought made one feel like he's alone and evil.
- PA
"One, I felt the same way when I saw that thug's face. You can tell alot by a face, and his said stupid, unremorseful, unproductive, violent, ignorant."
In college I took a class in Modern Euro history. There was some interesting stuff about how Western crime fighting techniques came of age in the late 19th Century (also, not surprisingly, the age of Conan-Doyle). Like the precogs in "Minority Report", European scientists devoted quite a bit of time to predicting criminality. This was done by analyzing criminals' facial features. The idea being, of course, that some common racial & tempermental characteristics could be discerned. Ideally, once the science was fully developed social engineering could begin. People predisposed to crime could be segregated, discouraged from breeding, or otherwise dealt with. Keep in mind that this was the era before mass immigration from the colonies, so probably 95 % of all European criminals were caucasoids.
I took this class in the early 2000's on a Politically Correct campus, so the unspoken implications of this were obvious: "bigoted" Western Europeans even prejudged their own race based on pseudo-science.
My professors COULD have pointed out that there was a grain of truth to these methods. Fetal Alcohol Syndrome gives children the characteristic hooded eyelids, high foreheads, & half-asleep expression you see on so many thugs. Nutritional deficiencies also cause facial distortion. Maternal drinking & neglect, of course, tie into delinquency.
Nowadays, guess which races suffer disproporionately from substance abuse during gestation? And malnutrition (due to misuse of food stamps)?
Take a look at crime websites like Thesmokinggun, or even that famous collection of 0bama T-shirt wearers' mugshots. The facial features on many Negroid criminals are practically interchangeable.
@ TUJ:
Yes, whites run everything, but that doesn't mean they have political, social, and cultural control. They must endure a political class that ignores their concerns (primarily immigration). They must endure a social doctrine that demands adherence to PC and a complete silencing of all racial truths. They must endure a culture that denigrates them, portrays them as evil or stupid, and does not celebrate their traditions. I could keep going.
Sure, whites run everything, but they're still under attack. Who cares if most of those perpetuating the war against whiteness are whites themselves?
Read my post on Drudge for more of this argument about the false racial hierarchy.
http://onestdv.blogspot.com/2011/06/misleading-racial-hierarchy.html
If you think that whites still control everything IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRES OF THE MAJORITY OF WHITE AMERICANS, then why the hell are you on HBD/reactionary sites? If everything is just dandy, then why are you discussing race-related problems? According to you, there aren't any.
I would be considered by most people in our gentle society a frothing-at-the-mouth racist, but even I have to acknowledge that the subhumans which I personally refer to as "Black Trash" comprise less than 30% of the Black community. However, that 30% is protected by most of the other 70% of that population.
By failing to loudly and publicly condemn the atrocious behavior of Black Trash, the Blacks who prefer to live like civilized humans give their tacit approval to such behavior. By supporting groups such as the SPLC and the NAACP that hamper every effort to restore order in the Black community, the GOOD Blacks are actively supporting the behavior of the lawless 30%.
That being the case, there are very few Black "friendlies". Unless the hard working, law abiding Blacks are willing to join Whites in the coarse methods that must be used to control the subhuman elements of the American Black population, then they are as much a part of the "fucking nigger" problem as the thugs who are attacking whites.
They must choose, and we must choose as well.
The time for a peaceful end of the Black Trash's reign of terror is almost gone. The Wild West is upon us, and the Wild West solutions are looming.
"there are very few Black "friendlies". "
I've been making this argument for a long time. The bottom half of black society is criminal, the upper half circles wagons for them, and black elite lionizes Jena trash on BET. I've also coined the term "decent black folk" as ironic reference to law-abiding blacks who at least rhetorically defend criminal blacks.
PA
I lived in New Orleans for three years. That cured me of any illusions about non-Whites desire and ability if the opportunity presented itself to do me the most serious bodily harm they could.
Fun times.
Whites do not run the NBA, NFL (or Michael Vick would not have played the last two seasons), Rap Music, the Presidency, the Attorney General's office, the Governorship of MA, and most commercials (which feature Blacks 80% of the time). Whites are terribly vulnerable economically to Black predation re: Property. And there are no boom times to ease the pain of a declining neighborhood. People are stuck.
As for Black men, it is true that most White women don't marry them or sleep with them ... but I would not call Traci Johnson either unattractive or stupid. Traci Johnson (19 and an intern at NBC at the time of the affair, when Barber dumped his pregnant Black wife of 11 years with whom he already had two kids) is the daughter of IIRC a hedge fund manager. Nor would that apply to Eliza Dushku (engaged to Rick Fox) or Amanda Bynes (Kid Curry).
It is true that few White women date/marry outside the race, but that does not mean that Black men are not without a racially based sexual market arbitrage advantage.
"However, that 30% is protected by most of the other 70% of that population."
I think you just hit on something there. One of the reasons white people are so squeamish about any display of white ethnic solidarity is that they think that thinking like that is..thinking like black people. And that's repellent. Who among you would want to circle the wagons around a group of violent, dumb white punks that savagely attacked an innocent black? I realize its unlikelihood, but the hypothetical is valuable in that it shows exactly why so many whites aren't more up front about any shade of WN thought. To do so is to not be white.
When people think white nationalist, they think someone who would do exactly as blacks are doing now with these boys, and who would act like that? Not me.
Further, while this is horrible, I really don't see this as being anything other than another flash in the pan moment in the AltRight blogosphere. His parents told that thug to ask God for forgiveness. With that attitude, well, I just don't know what to say.
But, as others have written, this behavior is largely cultural. Black victimize so many, so often precisely because everyone tells them they are the victims. I suppose the only thing to do is utterly reject the notion that the sins of the past allow endless retribution in the present.
"One of the reasons white people are so squeamish about any display of white ethnic solidarity is that they think that thinking like that is..thinking like black people. And that's repellent."
It seems like Whites are so balkanized there's no real basis for "Nationalism" in the first place. It's a little circular, but there's probably no better explanation.
A small but culturally influential # of "Whites" are Jews. Good luck getting them to admit Blacks ever misbehave.
Then you have Middle/Upper Class White women, who are also no help. Not because they "HATE HATE HATE Beta Males" & love nonwhites, but because of how pliable they are. Most seem to live their lives in accordance with multi-culti dictates; they're terrified of being perceived as "non-compassionate" to gays/Blacks/etc.
Upper Class White males are generally insulated from nonwhite dysfunction due to their money.
Poorer whites of both genders are somewhat opposed to minorities' excesses because they experience them firsthand (IIRC the Justice Dept found that White males make up a plurality of hate crime victims). Still, they often imitate Black culture and are likely to have Black friends, favorite Black athletes/musicians, and so on. And many of them are just not political animals.
Compare these disparate groups with, say, Blacks of any income level. From the head of BET to the underclass their politics are uniform, and they pursue their interests aggressively. All the while rejecting "White" culture and all its manifestations. Contrary to the illusions of Bush II & Karl Rove (if we promote home ownership, they'll finally like us!)
It is clear that whites need to develop a new set a words to accurately reflect minorities. We could easily coin 10 words that would substitute the ones we used to use but without all the baggage. 1STD, you should have a contest to see which words should replace the n-word, c-word, ... The winner would get a baby's arm holding an apple.
@Nine
I agree about the whole notion of 'whiteness'. Many on the Alt Right rightly disparage the odious Wise/Ignatiev crowd, but, in a small way they have a point. 'Whites tend to think of themselves as 'white' the more they see the contrast between, say, Irish and Yankee vs. Irish and Somali. Indeed, in certain parts of the country the sense of 'whiteness' as a uniting force came about only because of the presence of extremely foreign people. I'm thinking Kearney and the Knights of Labor, and the CHinese Exclusion Act. The idea that, after the 1924 Immigration Act and the subsequent 40 year window, we all became American white is a little too simplistic. Really, the broad Caucasian group of peoples, even those very closely related, positively revel in the tiniest of differences.
I'm rambling a bit but my main point is, unfortunately, we've never been as solidly unified as it is sometimes implied. Perhaps, things being and going as they are, that will permanently change. If that does happen it would not be so much a reversion to/reestablishment of an imagined past, but rather the beginning of something quite new...
Man, I hope he makes a come back.
@ Nine and DB:
OK, maybe the notion of whiteness is exaggerated (I disagree because most American whites, besides the Jews, Irish, and Italian have no connection to their ancestral homeland).
But let's say you're right - that means you need a complementary ethos to buttress the perhaps weak notion of whiteness.
And that's American nationalism, especially as it connects to the European biological groups and Western historical traditions that birthed this nation. Throw in some cultural and social conservatism and there ya go.
In essence, America needs to be seen as a daughter state of Europe (which it is). The trivial differences of white ethnics will be null compared to that.
One,
There's another group that used to be quite ethnocentric, perhaps more so than the others you mentioned; Germans. What happened to them? They didn't assimilate in any joyful, calm way. Their languages and traditions were, backed by the war-state, effectively suppressed.
You seem to make a connection between American Nationalism and whiteness. It's there, I don't deny it, but, as Sailer has written, American nationalism has this tendency to be, well, American above all else. Like, f#$k Euros-in-favor-of-our-blacks-type stuff.
"In essence, America needs to be seen as a daughter state of Europe (which it is). The trivial differences of white ethnics will be null compared to that."
I think a significant aspect of American nationalism is not that it sees itself as a 'daughter' to Europe, but rather a triumph over Europe. (More of a son who has conquered his father). I'm a little confused about this, and let me explain why...
I feel there are two narratives of America, the first regards itself as a specifically British (English, Scottish, Ulster-Scot, Welsh), Protestant creation, a perfection, a city on the hill. And in many respects this is true (see Albion's Seed). The other narrative has us as this happy collective of Europe, or as you wrote, a "daughter to". The two are not necessarily mutually exclusive, but at some point they do present a conflict of vision, of ethnicity.
You write of "trivial differences"; my major point is that they only become trivial in the presence of racial foreigners. Perhaps for this very reason there is hope.
I describe this sort of behavior as "Orkish": need I say more?
Per the official US Department of Justice website, blacks who are only 12.3% of the population (per the 2000 U.S. Census) committed 52.2% of all homicides in the US during the 30 years ending December, 2005. EVERYBODY ELSE (87.7% of the population: Hispanics, American Indians, Asian-European-Arab Americans, and South Pacific Islanders) only committed 47.8% of homicides. Therefore, on a per-capita basis, blacks commit murder at a rate 7.8 times that of all other people in the United States. Per Professor Emeritus of History at Haverford College Roger Lane in his books on murder in America, this relative ratio of per-capita figures for blacks committing murder to that of the general population goes back at least to the 1830's when accurate criminal statistics started to be maintained. This was before the advent of heroin or crack or the ready availability of handguns in the black population.
To understand the reality here one should read NYTimes science editor and columnist Nicholas Wade's book BEFORE THE DAWN. Or read his recent NYTimes article "Human Culture, an Evolutionary Force." Or read Gregory Cochran and Henry Harpending's book THE 10,000 YEAR EXPLOSION. Here the casual reader can learn about recently developed understanding on how people quickly (in anthropological terms, that is) change genetically under the influence of culture, commerce, mercantilism, migration, farming, etc. From thickly-boned impulsive violent early humans, people developed more gracile physiques along with greater sociability and higher IQ because it was (is?) advantageous for reproductive success. Some people, developing in Nothern Europe and Asia, are farther along in this process. Social, governmental, and economic policies should be implemented that enhance this process, rather than the dysgenic process of welfare promoting that the most violent, indolent, and criminal people have the most offspring.
According to a survey for the period 1998–2000 compiled by the United Nations, South Africa was ranked second for murder and first for assaults and rapes per capita.
"To understand the reality here one should read NYTimes science editor and columnist Nicholas Wade's book BEFORE THE DAWN. Or read his recent NYTimes article "Human Culture, an Evolutionary Force." Or read Gregory Cochran and Henry Harpending's book THE 10,000 YEAR EXPLOSION. Here the casual reader can learn about recently developed understanding on how people quickly (in anthropological terms, that is) change genetically under the influence of culture, commerce, mercantilism, migration, farming, etc. From thickly-boned impulsive violent early humans, people developed more gracile physiques along with greater sociability and higher IQ because it was (is?) advantageous for reproductive success. Some people, developing in Nothern Europe and Asia, are farther along in this process. Social, governmental, and economic policies should be implemented that enhance this process, rather than the dysgenic process of welfare promoting that the most violent, indolent, and criminal people have the most offspring."
I like what you're saying what do you think of a people who for more than forty years and almost three generations have descended as opposed to ascended?
Now we know that blacks are born out of wedlock more than 70%. It's my belief that the average black has not have had the benefit of prenatal care, good early childhood development or nutrition. I would assume that the average black American in the inner city have a declined IQ and more mental problems than any other race. They are raised more or less just like their African brothers with the exception of more drugs and junk food. I am sure this has an effect.
MuayTyson
Has there been any comment from Obama or Eric Holder about this "teachable moment"?
"I agree that black violence is somewhat exaggerated"
It's not remotely exaggerated. How can anyone say it's exaggerated when the fact that 12% of the population is responsible for 50% of the murders is NEVER mentioned by politicians or the media.
If the amount of black crime the media covers up is currently lower than in recent years because of the huge increase in the number of black prisoners being locked up then that proves it's not exaggerated also.
.
"White America is not being genocided, black crime is at a historic low."
Yes it is and no it isn't. The historic lows were pre-segregration. Genocidal levels of anti-white black violence are simply below their peak.
.
"White Americans (including middle class whites) won't become more attracted to sociobiology because of this one black on white attack because they don't view themselves as victims because they run everything."
1) Anti-whites run everything that is critical at the political level - especially the media. The media censorship of anti-white violent crime is the biggest single factor in the ethnic cleansing of western cities.
2) White people need to start seeing themselves as victims in a stealth war that has been waged against them for decades because they are.
3) White people are heading to minority status with relentless levels of anti-white hatred and violence held in check solely by levels of incarceration that will soon be unaffordable. The South African endgame beckons. An identical crime when white people were 90% of the population is no longer identical.
"The historic lows were pre-segregration."
should have been
"The historic lows were pre-DEsegregration."
Carry a gun, it could save ur life
The Sarah Kreiger bus beating in Baltimore was part of an uptick in black wilding incidents that occurred precisely after Martin O'Malley became governor in January 2007 and the city countil president Sheila Dixon assumed office. Make of that what you will.
Post a Comment