When people have asked the above question, they imply that I'm basically an asshole who simply wants to demean others for their failures. But that's not at all true; primarily, I don't want public policy to reflect a deluded notion of man nor do I want our culture to refrain from celebrating the undeniably valuable. My criticism of polite society's lies does not mean I want to mock or belittle those that don't measure up. In fact, none of us "measure up" in every aspect of life, so such a position would be rather self-defeating.
In the end, the problem here reduces to how the left has perverted the following childhood maxim:
Try your best and that's all that matters.This actually used to mean something. We used to demand that society adhere to this simple, yet sagacious idea. After all, if we pursue success with everything we have, then we should be proud. We can only change our desire and our work ethic, not the basic gifts of birth. Contrary to popular belief, we don't all have a genius inside. Maybe I lean towards "everyone wins" liberal here as opposed to accepting the sterile notion of conservative success, but oh well.
Yet, the crusading liberals weren't satisfied with this. Perhaps due to their listlessness, their entitled attitude, their own gnawing failures, or their unending quest to dismantle everything sacred, liberals changed this slogan to something along the lines of:
Try your best, but if you fail, we'll find someone to blame.The external cause of failure shows up in essentially every aspect of life, reflecting the notion that society hold no one responsible for their actions. We have murderers using the bad childhood defense, New York helicopter moms suing preschools for future lost educational opportunities, fat acceptance harpies railing against popular culture, and feminists blaming men for just about anything. Though the left didn't stop there (do they ever?); they went a step further to something like:
Don't bother trying because whatever they want you do is racist, classist, sexist, ageist, homophobic, intolerant, bigoted, insensitive, and/or sizeist.So now, instead of trying your best and taking pride in your personal triumphs and hard work, we have a generation of entitled pansies blaming their failures on some nefarious and always amorphous third party. And perhaps it makes them feel good for awhile, but I think they all understand, deep down inside, the ruse they play on themselves. Finally, it's ironic that the left tacitly rejects working hard. After all, they believe hard work and only hard work determines success. Funny that they only espouse such a belief in certain situations, e.g. fatties have a higher weight baseline but everyone can score above average in school.
17 comments:
The fact that so much liberal/leftist ideology such as this relies on blank-slate egalitarian nonsense which is so easily refuted by anyone with a mind open to reason and evidence gives me hope for its defeat. As liberals, especially academic liberals, continually congratulate themselves about their openness to reason and evidence, it should be possible to trap them in to conceding the foundation of their politics. The more naive adherents may even do some of the work themselves, such as genetics and psychology/neuroscience researchers. These are cracks through which a conservative worldview can enter the academy again, perhaps in the form of something like Larry Arnhart's Darwinian conservatism with a strong HBD component.
These leftist memes are so seductive because they don't require much in the way of hard self-directed activity, either mentally or physically. After all, if it's somebody else's fault, just force them to change their behavior.
In short, liberalism is always the easy way out.
However, that is also the reason why I can't see how these attitudes will ever be defeated. I'm afraid the only thing that will cause society as a whole to forsake its leftist lurch, is a complete civilizational breakdown that leaves each individual only two choices: work hard or die.
ericcs, while I appreciate the moral laziness of liberalism is intuitively appealing, there appears to me much that is counter-intuitive, especially in race/sex differences sphere, that can only be maintained by relatively secure intellectual hegemony. Without such a stranglehold on the academy and the schools, I doubt the foundational internationalist and blank-state myths of liberalism would survive long. I could, however, be underestimating the difficulty of the intellectual scene changing significantly without some wider societal upheaval as you suggest is necessary.
Lemniscate, I hope you are right and I am wrong... frankly, I don't think I'm going to do all that well if upheaval occurs.
I was reading Rolling Stone the other day and they showed a study that proved that Mexicans work the hardest of Mericans.
About 6 years ago I bought a very nice, expensive car. I was about 45 when I bought it and it was the first nice car I had ever really owned. Little did I know it but that car was actually a touchstone. People who were ambitious themselves and had a strong work ethic (I’m a small business owner) almost uniformly congratulated me and were happy for my success. They felt good for me and would have liked to have had the same themselves if they already did not. The opposite occurred from those on the left hand of the bell curve. Those who attributed all of their toil and lack of perceived success seemed to resent it. Although I have never been one to wear my diamond ring under people’s noses I quickly figured out that there was more to it than me showing off. The car reminded many people of their own lack of achievement and they resented themselves but could not express it as such. Many of the same people who despised my choice in car were the same ones that are virulently Democratic-Progressive in their political leanings. They would tell you that they are for a steep income tax or estate tax because it is good for the economy of the deficit when in reality they simply want to bring the top down a notch. They had given up on trying to improve their lot on their own and had invested all of their efforts in blame. The irony is that many of these same people took much better vacations than I, worked fewer hours over their entire careers, had more play time, etc. Poverty sucks but so does envy.
To regard a man's fate as the exclusive product of his own responsibility is as untrue and unfair as only considering the circumstances.
Concerning liberal moral laziness: if you haven't already done so, I would strongly suggest the reading of Ortega y Gasset's essay "The Revolt of the Masses", a very comprehensive and prescient (written in the 30s) study on the subject.
"... frankly, I don't think I'm going to do all that well if upheaval occurs."
In what way do you think you would not do well? Morally? Physically?
Sorry if my questions seem too personal but your statement is just so upsetting.
I'm a woman in my mid-50s with health problems and some but not much money. If upheaval occurs, I firmly intend to do well or die trying.
For me, the current situation in America has moral--or immoral--aspects which only make me more determined to survive, come hell or high water. It's not merely a matter of ensuring my own survival but of seeing right done.
I actually bought Ortega y Gasset's essay "The Revolt of the Masses" and tried to read it.
It was too much Marxist to me.
I like better "We are doomed" by John Derbyshire. Lot's of sociology, but reasonable, and more relevant to USA life.
Respectfully, F.r.
This reminded me of comedian Jeff Stilson's routine about blame:
"I'm a failure because my father's an alcoholic...No, you're father's an alcoholic b/c you're a loser."
A lot of guys who wish they were swinging from the chandeliers in their sex lives, so to speak, do this, too.
I don't know quite when this meme started, but was around in the nineties and was popular with baby-boomers back then was the belief that "religious guilt" was holding them back. Had they not been raised as Christians, which they had rejected, they would have had more and better women. One fifty-something family member recently blamed his failing to get second dates on attending an all male Catholic school.
Today, different generation, same complaints, but different culprits.
One of your best - 1STDV
OneSTDV Fri, May 6, 2011 - 2237
One STDV wrote:
In real life, I don't exactly shy away from discussing bio-realism, though I don't use the same tone as used here. Occasionally, someone will catch on, as when one friend pointedly asked me, "you're into eugenics, aren't you?" But usually people respond with surprise and mild disgust, often accusing me of lacking decency. On more than one occasion, the other person has said something like, "so you just go up to random fat people on the street and call them ugly?" I ask how exactly did expressing obvious truths become tantamount to emotionally and personally abusing strangers.
-------------------------
Being willing to speak your mind will lead to respect, even from people who don't agree with you.
I've found that many people are quite receptive to HBD (Human Bio Diversity) views, once they have gotten over the shock and horror of someone stating such plain truths.
Telling someone that fat females are repulsive to the male eye kills many birds at once. One, that it causes the male member to shrivel, two, it cause the male member to go limp, three, ... need I go on?
It's not abuse to state those facts, it's pure kindness.
don't feel bad, yesterday I got thrown out of the Jewish Community Center for referring to the lifeguards as "girls." I'm told I have one final chance to bring my speech up to blue-state standard.
"don't feel bad, yesterday I got thrown out of the Jewish Community Center for referring to the lifeguards as "girls." I'm told I have one final chance to bring my speech up to blue-state standard."
Did this really happen? I can almost see it...
"We can only change our desire and our work ethic, not the basic gifts of birth."
Isn't it possile that ambition and work ethic are also (to some extent) gifts of birth? I do think people can strive to work harder, but I also think that it's easier for some than for others. Some people just naturally have more ambition and motivation.
Those who are more gifted in this category should maybe be mindful of those who don't and those who aren't should strive to not be resentful of those who are.
Katana opined:
"Being willing to speak your mind will lead to respect, even from people who don't agree with you.
"I've found that many people are quite receptive to HBD (Human Bio Diversity) views, once they have gotten over the shock and horror of someone stating such plain truths."
With leftists, their shock and horror is often unending, because their views are almost never contested by mainstream polite society. Left-wing views are inescapable, and so those on the "right" are used to hearing them. Not so for the left. Right-wing views must be sought out (and I'm not talking about the quite leftist and corporatist WSJ and Fox News).
Leftists can say any old asinine thing to me and I'm never shocked, because I've heard it all before. I've had lefties freeze me out or act openly hostile toward me (call me stupid, evil, etc.) for expressing non-PC, evidence-based views.
The best way to live life is like a happy warrior -- always try your best, live in the moment, and forget about outcomes. This approach to life has also made me enemies amongst those who obsess over "achievement."
But who cares about them anyway? They don't really celebrate my successes; they feel only envy when my "achievements" exceed theirs. Screw 'em.
Post a Comment