Even More Evidence for Sexual Evolutionary Pscyhology

Here's a number of interesting links supporting evolutionary psychology and its implications for sexual attraction. Ogling women is a natural reflex:

You're at a café with the woman in your life when your eyes move inexorably toward another woman walking by. In one-fifth of a second, before the conscious mind has had a chance to react, the male brain has rendered judgment on whether the oncoming stranger is sexually hot.

Pupils dilate, heart rate spikes, testosterone surges and the eyes assume a vacant stare — sure signs that the “man trance” has set in. For genetically preprogrammed men, the offence is as involuntary and natural as breathing, says brain researcher, neuropsychiatrist and author Louann Brizendine, whose book, The Male Brain, mounts a unique defence for such male indiscretions. The sexual pursuit area in the male brain is 2.5 times larger than the one in the female brain “consuming him with sexual fantasies about female body parts,” she concludes.

The author, an uncommon purveyor of truth in today's politically tinged academia, defends this male impulse:

“It's a reflex that's built into the brain circuits,” she said in an interview. “At its core biological basis, it's unfair to criticize men for that initial unconscious circuitry.” In light of this, male ogling must henceforth be considered genetic destiny rather than anti-social creepiness.

The article alludes to the "creepiness" factor associated with ogling. Once again, the prevailing zeitgeist seeks to undermine typically male behavior derived from our natural state. The author relays some female responses to the study - summed up with this classic "shaming tactic":

“You're pathetic.”

The astute female neuroscientist expounds upon the motivation for such ire:

“Women feel competitive about their looks with other women. It's a very core, basic biology that our female brains are very threatened by other women that might out-compete us.”

And the author sums up much of our current feminized culture:

The peace-seeking male, then, has only one option: To deny his hard-wired humanity and keep eyes focused at the ground at all times.

Another study finds ovulating women tend to buy sexier clothes:

In an unconscious attempt to outdo female rivals, ovulating women buy sexier clothing, according to a new study in the Journal of Consumer Research. The authors' research provides some of the first evidence of the influence of hormonal factors on consumer behavior. "We found that, when ovulating, women choose sexier fashion products when thinking about other attractive, local—but not distant—women," the authors write.

Now how can the liberal creationists explain away this one. I don't recall our supposedly omnipotent cultural edifices containing explicit or implicit dictates for acting in this manner. And the participants were completely ignorant as to the rationale:

The authors found that women were not conscious of their choices and the researchers did not find the same effect in non-ovulating women.

Finally, a study finds yet another inborn indicator of sexual value - alphas have their own scent:

It is thought the phenomenon helps women sniff out alpha males, in the belief they will provide them with healthy children. The scented signal may also provide wimps with a subtle warning that there is a superior male nearby who is not to be messed with.

German psychologists behind the findings studied the link between a man’s sweat and his level of aggression, which is critical to the survival of a species. However sophisticated tests on the womens’ skin found they were more aroused by the badminton players’ sweat, with anxious women the most sensitive.

All these studies evince the same supposition: modern man is a vestige of his evolutionary history, his inherent aptitudes, desires, and wants forged by sexual and physical competition. Any honest individual can discern the fallaciousness of man as infinitely pliable with culture, money, rote training in childhood, and Ivy League "Teach(ers) for America" making all the difference. We can try to escape these truths through willfull ignorance or cultural indoctrination, but nature always wins. I applaud these scholars for not capitulating to modern academia's PC culture. I imagine this "blasphemous" research was met with opposition from the keepers of our noblest lies. Unfortunately, decades of failure haven't stopped the seemingly indomitable forces of anti-reality liberalism.