Liberalism: The Undermining of Kin

I've offered several overlapping theories concerning the philosophical underpinnings of liberalism. I've argued that liberalism is a de facto religion, holding diversity, tolerance, and equal outcome as the preeminent values. Additionally, as noted in regards to almost any leftist educational initiative, liberals seek to engineer a humanity absent of outliers and totally uniform in all characteristics.

A rather uncommon theory is that liberalism, the kind propagated by an avaricious elite, represents the undermining of kin. This occurs on both macro (nations and races) and micro (family, communities) scales. The kind of liberalism that doesn't view itself as a tool for promoting a global utopia, but rather as a means for appropriating wealth and power uses this pernicious strategy to accomplish their objectives.

What the power elite do is enervate the strength of kin bonds, replacing these elements of self-governance and value with those of a larger community more easily manipulated through public coercion. To illustrate this let me give a brief summary of how this works:

Micro:

• Family: Liberals detest the nuclear family, seeing it as a vestige of our bucolic past. As in the Murphy Brown controversy, they glorify single motherhood as an honorable and viable situation, one that of course often leads to government or communal assistance. Further, they champion birth control and exaggerated theories concerning global warming as a means to depress birth rate and thus decrease family bonds.
  
  
• Homosexuality: Related to the above. Homosexuality is generally a childless relationship. The codification of homosexuality implies liberals undervalue reproduction and family as an important facet of life.
  
  
• "It takes a village": Hilary Clinton's famous remark represents how liberals view child raising as not the sole responsibility of parents. Instead, it's the larger community, one inevitably affected by widespread social mores, that must impact a child's development. In addition, the inclusion of women in the workplace has lead to significantly more time for babies and young children in daycare under the supervision of adults not part of their family.
  
  
• Religion: Religious communities used to provide a sheltered social sphere for families. With the advent of megachurches (not necessarily liberal though) and the continuing secularization of the West, the church no longer functions as a restricted social space where certain behavioral (usually conservative) norms are championed.

Macro:

• Globalism: The current global warming controversy illustrates how liberals will engage in rather overt equivocation in order to advance globalist initiatives. In doing so, they aim to dissolve national boundaries that strongly correspond with traditional culture and ethnic bonds, replacing these with a central system of decision making and control. Memes such as the recently revived "We are the World" song and nomenclature such as "mankind" and "one people" promote the idea that all nations have a moral duty for sharing. This inevitably weakens Western states, allows a central governing body to dispense orders, and undermines national and ethnic loyalty amongst peoples.
  
  
• Race: Boasian anthropology, supported by fallacious arguments such as Lewontin's fallacy and other duplicitous ideas, holds that race is merely a social construct with no biological basis. We're inundated with the specious claim that races are only 5% different, thus implying that any kin bonds are not supported by a rational appeal to science. As race often acts as the primary demarcation for social groups, this allows liberals to formulate a Marxist conception of humanity. By dismissing race as a biological entity, they attempt to classify any inequity as the result of oppression and any loyalty or commonality as unreasonable. This aids in their globalist vision, as without racial divisions, wealth redistribution, third-world charity, and central government become more tenable.