I have 12% unemployment in South Carolina. My state's on its knees. I have 31% African-American population in South Carolina.So basically, Senator Graham lists a large black population as a problem concerning his state's economics. Was Senator Graham merely alluding to blacks being poorer than whites or actually making a more general statement that a large black population leads to economic turmoil? From a second clip shown below, it seems he intended the former. But it doesn't matter, Rachel Maddow is flabbergasted.
Given this reaction, imagine Maddow being told about racial intelligence differences.
15 comments:
Lindsay Graham is the quintessential "suck butt." He accused those opposing McCain's amnesty of being bigots and now he invokes race again when it is apparently useful.
Lindsay (who reminds me so much of Gomer Pyle) simply uses race when it serves his political purpose or the purpose of the US Chamber of Commerce. It was the Chamber of Commerce who invited and facilitated millions of illegal aliens into the country to work so cheaply. Now their children have turned around and voted overwhelming (70%)for Obama, tipping the numbers enough along with the black vote (90%) to get him elected. The fat cats are simply getting their just desserts.
Pat Buchanan once had the perfect opportunity to help her.
*tell her (about race differences)
You think Buchanan is aware of HBD? I'm not sure he is. If he was aware of HBD, I can't imagine him shying away from bringing it up. Yet I've never heard of him broaching the subject in any context. (Maybe he is, I'm just not aware of it.)
Buchanan once sent a signed copy of one of his books to Steve Sailer.
You think Buchanan is aware of HBD? I'm not sure he is. If he was aware of HBD, I can't imagine him shying away from bringing it up. Yet I've never heard of him broaching the subject in any context. (Maybe he is, I'm just not aware of it.)
In one of his books he defends The Bell Curve in passing. So yes, he's aware and is pulling punches.
"So yes, he's aware and is pulling punches."
But basically all of liberal whining about racial disparities (such as in the Maddow vs. Buchanan clip you linked to) is countered thoroughly by HBD. The conservative argument for limited immigration is supported by HBD. So much of the liberal/conservative debate (such as that recent Berkeley school shit you and HS linked to) can be argued by alluding to HBD.
So how come Buchanan is so shy about bringing it up? I'll answer my own question: As with Auster, it's too reductionist for him. It's too "science-y" for him. I can't imagine it's because he's afraid of being controversial so that must be it.
I commented on the Buchanan/Maddow debate when it first aired:
Maddow vs. Buchanan
More simple explanation:
They're scared.
He is saying black people are a burden, which they are. This health care scheme is meant to take money from white people and give it to black, Latino and any other poor non-white group.
Pat and Bay Buchanan are both very racially aware, but they are the wrong kind of racially aware, if you know what I mean. In 1990 Pat Bu hanan put out an article claiming to show that the gas chambers of Auschwitz must have been fiction because there had been a recent incident in America where some schoolchildren were trapped in a train in a tunnel and survived. As recently as 2006 he was still writing columns that could be classified as at least pro-Hitler apologist, if you scrub through everythiing you can find on Google. Bay is similar from what Ive heard so I suspect it;s their whole family.
As for why he doesnt do the IQ thing, there could be any number of reasons. Maybe it just doesnt get him the good ratings, or maybe he doesnt like it becxause the Jews have higher IQs than Catholic whites in general.
"The conservative argument for limited immigration is supported by HBD."
HBD can "support" a lot of things. It's nothing more than an appeal to science.
In 1990 Pat Bu hanan put out an article claiming to show that the gas chambers of Auschwitz must have been fiction because there had been a recent incident in America where some schoolchildren were trapped in a train in a tunnel and survived.
It wasn't about the gas chambers of Auschwitz, but rather the mobile diesel vans. The dispute was over the lethality of diesel fumes.
IN case anyone is interested, a long discussion of the topic by those on both sides of the issue:
http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2006/06/why-diesel-issue-is-irrelevant.html
Does anyone know if they story is true about Rushton rushing inside while his house was burning to save a portrait of Adolf Hitler?
People like Buchanan make the HBD community look pro Nazi by association. We really have to be very forward about high jewish IQ before talking about low black IQ. That could be a way to get traction with the elites in the US.
@ Johnson:
Do you have a source for that, other than the SPLC?
Stopped Clock,
Buchanan's articles criticizing American involvement in World War II have always been logical and essentially irrefutable.
I admit there was one place in a book where he might've started romanticizing Hitler, but other than that I know of nothing he’s said or wrote about the Nazis that would draw ire if we lived in more sane World.
Post a Comment