Friday, October 30, 2009

Woman Demands All-White Nursing Staff: Hospital Quarantined due to bad case of Racism

It's commonly known that white Christians are forbidden to freely associate with each other; yet, the same luxury is actually encouraged amongst minorities. For example, Walter Williams describes some absurdities occurring at elite universities:
What about segregated graduation ceremonies? Vanderbilt, Stanford University, the University of California, the University of Michigan and the University of Pennsylvania are among those that offer separate graduation ceremonies and separate "celebratory events" for black, Hispanic and Asian-American students. University administrators not only condone segregated ceremonies but racially segregated student housing, as well. This "enlightened" policy not only occurs at backwater colleges but at our most elite universities, such as Stanford, Cornell, MIT, Pennsylvania and California-Berkeley.
And here's a site for a counseling service specifically designed for blacks.
At Afro-American Counseling & Psychotherapy Institute, Inc., the Counselor/ Psychotherapist is a product of and continues to be a part of the African-American cultures and communities. The Afro-centric, Afro-Cognitive approach used at AACPI empowers the client by providing a unique corrective experience that is liberating, relevant, and solution-oriented.
Well at least they're HBDers ("Afro-cognitive" must refer to innate cognitive traits unique to blacks, right?). There are innumerable outlets for the "unique needs" of minorities. In any context, they have access to care provided by individuals of their ethnic background and suited to their particular needs (what those are I'm not sure). But in addition to the gross immorality of white flight, how dare white people ask for the same thing? Someone did and it didn't turn out well. In fact, they launched an investigation into her blatant thoughtcrime!
Hospital staff have complained to the Equality and Human Rights Commission after a woman in labour demanded an all-white team to deliver her baby.

The hospital began its own internal investigation and it has now been reported to Equality and Human Rights Commission, which received complaints from hospital staff about the incident and how it was dealt with.
In this age of affirmative action, such a choice might be the most prudent one. But don't worry, the thoughtpolice are on it.
A spokeswoman for the hospital said: “There is an ongoing investigation, which commenced after the incident occurred, relating to medical complications and because some staff expressed concern about the potential for racial discrimination, should such demands be raised by patients in the future.
In my opinion, this women is free to choose her caregivers and if she does so on a racial basis, then so be it. Such a choice doesn't necessarily imply animus, rather it implies a freedom of association. People tend to feel most comfortable with individuals like themselves and the first indicator of such similarity is generally physical. Perhaps this woman is a racist, but if we're willing to afford such concessions to minorities, then why aren't white people given the same outlets? Why is whiteness considered an absence of culture and thus not privy to the same ethnic concerns or issues?

13 comments:

Prime said...

I had plenty of black nannies, and I turned out alright:)

j r said...

Well at least they're HBDers ("Afro-cognitive" must refer to innate cognitive traits unique to blacks, right?).

exactly. you guys are one in the same.

the answer to this dilemna is simple. the woman should be free to ask for whatever sort of staff she wants. and the hospital, so long as it's private, should be free to decide whether they accommodate her or not.

Dalrock said...

I agree that there is a huge double standard, but I don't think this case applies. No one can go into a hospital, hotel, restaurant, and demand to be served by people of their own race.

What would demonstrate the double standard is if this woman had tried to create a counseling service, etc for whites.

OneSTDV said...

OK if she just walked in, she has no case. But if she had made arrangements for her care beforehand, she should be able to pick her caregivers.

I doubt they would have obliged if the latter case either.

silly girl said...

This seems to be a case of you get what you pay for, as well as location. If you live in a practically all white area, guess who works in the hospital. I got sick once in exburban/rural Kansas. Guess what race all the doctors and nurses were? The dietician looked to be from India.

Also, most hospitals have a policy of letting you ask for a different nurse. So if the nurse you get isn't to your liking, you can ask to change. Of course, doing this in the rudest way possible might not yield the best results.

However, as my mother told me, when you pay the bills you get to have it your way. If she is paying for the service, they should do as much as they can to accommodate her.

Not knowing her situation, I might say she could have hired a midwife and had the baby at home. Not always feasible of course, but she would be able to pick her midwife. My friend has five kids and the last two she had at home no problem.

silly girl said...

Fun link for annoying commenters.

http://js-kit.com/comment.put


Sorry, couldn't resist.

Dalrock said...

@ OneSTDV
OK if she just walked in, she has no case. But if she had made arrangements for her care beforehand, she should be able to pick her caregivers.

No. You don't get to pick the staff who will take care of you at the hospital. You can pick your doctor, but even then often times they work as part of a larger group so this woman would have had to somehow vet the whole group. It isn't just a matter of the Civil Rights act (no small matter in itself), but it simply isn't practical to run things this way.

Lions Roar said...

OneSTDV,

This story has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with Christians. So why bring Christianity into this? Are you implying that white non-Christians have it easier? Are you one of those Christians with a persecution/victimization syndrome or do you just pander to that crowd?

OneSTDV said...

I was using the term "Christian" in a nominal sense. Nothing to do with religious belief.

Dalrock said...

@jr
exactly. you guys are one in the same.

Your point is escaping me here. Could you explain?

the answer to this dilemna is simple. the woman should be free to ask for whatever sort of staff she wants. and the hospital, so long as it's private, should be free to decide whether they accommodate her or not.

I believe (but am not sure) that this might have been the case in some parts of the US say in 1963. But it isn't today. The case in question was in the UK, so I'm not sure the history there. However, I'm fairly certain this wouldn't be an option there either.

Either way I don't see your solution as a good one. I'm all for freedom of association, but Hospitals fit my idea of a public accommodation, and I don't think we should change the laws in that respect.

My solution would be to enforce the 1964 Civil Rights act equally. That counseling institute is clearly violating the law both with respect to hiring as well as customers. But I respect that you and many White Nationalists, etc see this a different way.

Lions Roar said...

If it's only nominal then why is it so important?

mike said...

This would be more interesting if it was a partial-birth abortion.

Aa said...

Black women who ask for black nursing staff get their fetus
aborted. And there are plenty of all white groups. Stop making things up.